Defining Bad Faith
When you are faced with a bad faith denial of an insurance claim, working closely with an attorney who will explain clearly all rights, options and consequences can help to ensure that you make decisions that are in your best interests. Contact our firm today to schedule a consultation and case evaluation with an experienced attorney.
Answers to Your Bad Faith Questions
Do you think that you may have an insurance bad faith claim? If your insurance company is not providing you with the protection you deserve, it is time to talk to an experienced lawyer. At the The LePley Law Firm, our attorneys protect the rights of insurance bad faith victims across Washington. We can answer your questions and help you evaluate your options today.
Straight Talk. Experience. Results
Contact the The LePley Law Firm
Thank you for contacting The LePley Law Firm. Your message has been sent.
Call us now
or use the form below.
We are a litigation firm. We prepare every case for trial and we have the resources and experience to handle the most complex insurance bad faith claims. We are not afraid to take on big insurance companies and hold them accountable for their failure to fulfill their duties in full. Contact us today to schedule a free initial consultation, and we can start preparing your claim.
If you are not getting the protection you deserve from your insurance company, you may feel like you have no way to hold them responsible. By filing an insurance bad faith claim, you may be able to increase the value of your claim and recover additional compensation for attorney fees. No one should have to fight to get insurance protection, but when you do, we will be there to help. Contact us today to schedule a free initial consultation.
Defining Bad Faith
There are a number of actions and omissions that amount to bad faith on the part of the insurance company. One example of bad faith is an insurer’s unreasonable denial of an insurance claim. Another example is an insurer’s wrongful failure to defend the insured in a suit by an injured third party. This section briefly explains the differences between first-party and third-party bad faith and sets forth several examples of conduct that courts have held constituted bad faith. If you believe that your insurance company has acted in bad faith in handling your claim, talk to an attorney at The LePley Law Firm in Bellevue, Washington, who has experience handling bad faith claims.
First-party bad faith
About one-half of the states recognize a common law tort for bad faith in first-party insurance claims. Of these, most follow the more narrow approach set forth in a case from the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Anderson v. Continental Insurance Co. The court in that case found that the burden of proving bad faith essentially rests on the plaintiff, and that, to prevail, the plaintiff must show that the insurer was unreasonable in denying the claim and that the insurer knew or had a “reckless disregard of the lack of a reasonable basis for denying the claim.”
Other jurisdictions follow the approach the California Supreme Court took in Gruenberg v. Aetna Ins. Co., which only requires the plaintiff to show unreasonableness in denying the claim. Claims for first-party bad faith are commonly based on inadequate claim processing, improper investigation of a claim, delay in payment or the unreasonable denial of a claim.
Third-party bad faith
Liability insurance policies, such as those found in automobile and homeowner insurance policies, apply to claims against the insured by third parties. Liability policies set forth the insurer’s duties, which typically include paying covered claims, investigating claims and defending the insured in claims by third parties that fall within the scope of the policy. Third-party bad faith claims usually relate to an insurer’s unreasonable failure to settle an underlying suit (for example, by an injured party) against the insured; the insurer’s wrongful failure to defend a suit against the insured; or the insurer’s bad faith or negligence in defending the insured.
Examples of unreasonable claim settlement practices
In almost every state, laws exist that define unfair claim settlement practices. Courts have labeled the following actions by insurers as bad faith:
- Misrepresenting pertinent facts or policy provisions relating to coverage
- Failing to acknowledge or act with reasonable promptness in response to communications related to claims
- Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for prompt investigation of claims
- Failing to approve or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after adequate proof of the loss has been submitted
- Failing to, in good faith, provide prompt, fair and equitable settlement of claims in which liability is reasonably clear
- Unreasonably failing to protect the assets of a policyholder who is sued
- Attempting to settle a claim for less than the amount to which the insured is entitled
- Obviously putting an insurer’s financial interests above the interests of the policyholder
- Failing to promptly settle some claims in order to influence settlements under another portion of the insurance policy coverage
- Unreasonably attempting to undervalue a claim
- Failing to promptly offer reasonable explanation for denial of a claim
- Making threats, false accusations or oppressive demands on the insured
- Exploiting the insured’s vulnerable position
- Abusing the arbitration process
- Unfairly raising premiums for filing a claim
- Wrongfully cancelling or failing to renew a policy
Talk to an insurance lawyer
Your insurer has a responsibility to resolve your claim in good faith. If you believe you have been the victim of the bad faith denial of a claim, contact an experienced insurance attorney at The LePley Law Firm in Bellevue, Washington, to discuss your options.
DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent legal counsel for advice on any legal matter.